Covidien

STAINSTEEL

The article appears to be a device whose quality falls below that which it purports or is represented to possess, in that instrument is represented as stainless steel but does not meet requirements for such steel for surgical instruments.

DV QUALITY

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be adulterated since its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls below, that which it purports or is represented to possess.

DEVICEGMPS

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(1) in that the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, the manufacture, packing, storage, or installation of the device do not conform to the requirements of Section 520(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) or a condition prescribed by an order under section 520(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.

REGISTERED

It appears the device is subject to listing under 510(j) and the initial distributor has not registered as required by 21 CFR 807.20 (a)(5).

NOT LISTED

It appears the drug or device is not included in a list required by Section 510(j), or a notice or other information respecting it was not provided as required by section 510(j) or 510(k).

DE IMP GMP

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(1) in that it appears that the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, the manufacture of the device do not conform to the applicable requirements of section 520(f).

DE/RX KIT

The article appears to be a combination medical device/prescription drug kit for which the prescription drug component was manufactured in the U.S., is offered for import by other than the manufacturer, and reimportation does not appear to have been authorized by the Secretary for use in a medical emergency.

HOLES

The quality of the article falls below that which it purports or is represented to possess, in that the devices contain defects/holes.

NO 510(K)

The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it is a post 1976 device for which a Section 510(k)application does not appear to have been determined substantially equivalent or otherwise filed.