Rafhan Best Foods Limited
⚠️ Moderate Risk
FEI: 3004651980 • Lahroe, Punjab • PAKISTAN
FEI Number
3004651980
Location
Lahroe, Punjab
Country
PAKISTANAddress
14km-Multan Road, , Lahroe, Punjab, Pakistan
Moderate Risk
FDA Import Risk Assessment
This firm has a moderate history of FDA import refusals. Some attention may be warranted.
Statistics
Score Breakdown
How is this score calculated?
Proprietary Algorithm
- 40% Violation Severity — AI-assessed (1-10)
- 30% Refusal Volume — Logarithmic scale
- 20% Recency — Decays over 5 years
- 10% Frequency — Refusals per year
© ImportRefusal.com Original Analysis
Violation Summary
UNSAFE COL
The article appears to be, or to bear or contain a color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of Section 721(a).
NUTRIT LBL
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling fails to bear the required nutrition information.
LACKS N/C
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(e)(2) of the FD&C Act in that the food is in package form and the label fails to bear an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count in accordance with Section 403(e)(2) of the FD&C Act.
LABELING
The article appears in violation of FPLA because of its placement, form and/or contents statement.
COLOR LBLG
The article appears to contain an artificial coloring and it fails to bear labeling stating that fact.
NO ENGLISH
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(f) of the FD&C Act in that any word, statement, or other information required by or under the authority of the FD&C Act to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary terms of purchase and use (for example, label contains information in two or more languages but fails to repeat all required information in both languages in accordance with 21 CFR 101.15(c)(2), or label fails to include all required information in English in accordance with 21 CFR 101.15(c)(1), except in the case of articles distributed solely in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or in a Territory where the predominant language is one other than English)).
USUAL NAME
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(i)(1) of the FD&C Act in that the label fails to bear the common or usual name of the food, if any there be.
YELLOW #5
The food appears to bear or contain the color additive FD & C Yellow No. 5, which is not declared on the label per 21 CFR 74.705(a)(c) under section 721.
LIST INGRE
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(i)(2) of the FD&C Act in that it is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the label fails to bear the common or usual name of each such ingredient and/or the article purports to be a beverage containing vegetable or fruit juice, but does not bear a statement with appropriate prominence on the information panel of the total percentage of such fruit or vegetable juice contained in the food.
HEALTH C
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling bears an unauthorized nutrient content/health claim.
NO PROCESS
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that the manufacturer's failure to file a scheduled process demonstrates that the product is not being manufactured under the mandatory provisions of 21 CFR Part 108 and therefore appears to have been manufactured, processed, or packed, under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health.
UNAPPROVED
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be a new drug within the meaning of Section 201(p) without an approved New Drug Application (NDA).
DIETARY
The article purports to be or is represented for special dietary uses and its label does not appear to bear the nutritional information required by regulation.
Refusal History
| Date | Product | Violations | Division |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/8/2006 | 03YYT99OTHER BAKERY PRODUCTS, N.E.C. | Detroit District Office (DET-DO) | |
| 11/8/2006 | 20CCT14STRAWBERRY, JAM, JELLY, PRESERVES, MARMALADE, BUTTER AND CANDIED | 11UNSAFE COL | Detroit District Office (DET-DO) |
| 3/19/2004 | 04CGH07NOODLES, INSTANT | Southwest Import District Office (SWI-DO) | |
| 3/19/2004 | 35CGT99CUSTARD PUDDING (PIE) MIX, N.E.C. | Southwest Import District Office (SWI-DO) | |
| 3/19/2004 | 35AGY99GELATIN, N.E.C. | Southwest Import District Office (SWI-DO) | |
| 8/29/2003 | 03YYY99OTHER BAKERY PRODUCTS, N.E.C. | Detroit District Office (DET-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 38LFT11CHICKEN CONSOMME AND BOUILLION, PLAIN, DRIED | 482NUTRIT LBL | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) |
| 5/17/2002 | 38LFT11CHICKEN CONSOMME AND BOUILLION, PLAIN, DRIED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 38CDT12VEGETABLE CHICKEN SOUP, DRIED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 38CDT12VEGETABLE CHICKEN SOUP, DRIED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 28YDT99SPICES, FLAVORS AND SALT NOT MENTIONED ELSEWHERE, N.E.C. | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 35CFY99CUSTARD PUDDING (PIE) MIX, N.E.C. | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 29BDT02SOFT DRINK, CITRUS FRUIT FLAVORED, CARBONATED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 04CFY99NOODLES AND NOODLE PRODUCTS, N.E.C. | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 35AGT01GELATIN, FLAVORED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 35DFY99PUDDING (PIE FILLING) MIX, N.E.C. (NOT CUSTARD) | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 29AGT02SOFT DRINK, CITRUS FRUIT FLAVORED, NONCARBONATED | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/17/2002 | 37JCT24GARLIC SAUCE | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 5/10/2002 | 54YCR99VITAMIN, MINERAL, PROTEINS AND UNCONVENTIONAL DIETARY SPECIALITIES FOR HUMANS AND ANIMALS, N.E.C. | Los Angeles District Office (LOS-DO) | |
| 12/13/2001 | 21CCT99MIXED FRUIT, JAM, JELLY, PRESERVES, MARMALADE, BUTTER OR CANDIED, N.E.C. | 11UNSAFE COL | New York District Office (NYK-DO) |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rafhan Best Foods Limited's FDA import refusal history?
Rafhan Best Foods Limited (FEI: 3004651980) has 20 FDA import refusal record(s) in our database, spanning from 12/13/2001 to 11/8/2006.
What is an FEI number?
FEI stands for Firm Establishment Identifier. It's a unique number assigned by the FDA to identify establishments that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food, drugs, medical devices, or other FDA-regulated products. Rafhan Best Foods Limited's FEI number is 3004651980.
What types of violations has Rafhan Best Foods Limited received?
Rafhan Best Foods Limited has been cited for 13 different violation type(s). Common FDA violations include adulteration (unsafe or unsanitary products), misbranding (incorrect or misleading labels), and regulatory non-compliance.
Where does this information about Rafhan Best Foods Limited come from?
All FDA import refusal data for Rafhan Best Foods Limited is sourced from the official FDA Data Dashboard (datadashboard.fda.gov), a public government database maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Data sourced from the FDA Data Dashboard, a public database maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.