Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals
⚠️ High Risk
FEI: 3005452106 • Richmond, British Columbia • CANADA
FEI Number
3005452106
Location
Richmond, British Columbia
Country
CANADAAddress
12233 Riverside Way, , Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
High Risk
FDA Import Risk Assessment
This firm has a significant history of FDA import refusals with notable violations.
Statistics
Score Breakdown
How is this score calculated?
Proprietary Algorithm
- 40% Violation Severity — AI-assessed (1-10)
- 30% Refusal Volume — Logarithmic scale
- 20% Recency — Decays over 5 years
- 10% Frequency — Refusals per year
© ImportRefusal.com Original Analysis
Violation Summary
UNAPPROVED
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be a new drug within the meaning of Section 201(p) without an approved New Drug Application (NDA).
HEALTH C
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling bears an unauthorized nutrient content/health claim.
PLANT PART
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it is a dietary supplement that appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(s)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act in that the supplement contains an herb or other botanical described in section 201(ff)(1)(C), and the label or labeling of the supplement fails to identify any part of the plant from which the ingredient is derived.
DIRSEXMPT
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be a drug within the meaning of Section 201(g) and it lacks adequate directions for use.
NCONTACT
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it is a dietary supplement that appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(y) of the FD&C Act in that the dietary supplement label fails to bear a domestic address or phone number through which the responsible person (as described in section 761 of the FD&C Act) may receive a report of a serious adverse event with such dietary supplement.
NUTRIT LBL
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded in that the label or labeling fails to bear the required nutrition information.
DIETARYING
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it is a dietary supplement that appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(s)(2)(A) of the FD&C Act in that the dietary supplement label or labeling fails to list the name of each dietary ingredient of the supplement and the quantity of each such dietary ingredient or , with respect to a proprietary blend of such dietary ingredients, the total quantity of all dietary ingredients in the blend.
DIETARYLBL
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it is a dietary supplement that appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(s)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act in that the label or labeling fails to identify the product by using the term "dietary supplement", which term may be modified with the name of such an ingredient.
FALSE
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(a)(1 ) of the FD&C Act in that the labeling is false or misleading in any particular.
LACKS FIRM
The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) of the FD&C Act in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(e)(1) of the FD&C Act in that the food is in package form and the label fails to bear the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.
LABELING
The article appears in violation of FPLA because of its placement, form and/or contents statement.
NOT LISTED
It appears the drug or device is not included in a list required by Section 510(j), or a notice or other information respecting it was not provided as required by section 510(j) or 510(k).
SBGINSENG
The article is subject to refusal of admission in that it appears to be Misbranded because it or its ingredients purport to be or are represented as Ginseng, but are not an herb or herbal ingredient derived from a plant classified within the genus Panax.
Refusal History
| Date | Product | Violations | Division |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2/5/2025 | 54FEZ99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 118NOT LISTED | Division of Southeast Imports (DSEI) |
| 5/1/2019 | 54FYY12GINSENG (HERBAL & BOTANICALS, NOT TEAS) | Division of Northern Border Imports (DNBI) | |
| 5/1/2019 | 54FYY12GINSENG (HERBAL & BOTANICALS, NOT TEAS) | Division of Northern Border Imports (DNBI) | |
| 3/17/2017 | 54FYF99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 3864NCONTACT | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) |
| 1/30/2017 | 54FYY48GINKGO BILOBA (HERBAL & BOTANICALS, NOT TEAS) | 3140SBGINSENG | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) |
| 12/31/2015 | 54FYR99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Division of Northern Border Imports (DNBI) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYR99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYA99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYA99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCT99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | Division of Northern Border Imports (DNBI) | |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FCR99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 75UNAPPROVED | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYR99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 75UNAPPROVED | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYA99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 75UNAPPROVED | Seattle District Office (SEA-DO) |
| 11/24/2015 | 54FYR99HERBALS & BOTANICALS (NOT TEAS), N.E.C. | 75UNAPPROVED | Division of Northern Border Imports (DNBI) |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals's FDA import refusal history?
Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals (FEI: 3005452106) has 20 FDA import refusal record(s) in our database, spanning from 11/24/2015 to 2/5/2025.
What is an FEI number?
FEI stands for Firm Establishment Identifier. It's a unique number assigned by the FDA to identify establishments that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food, drugs, medical devices, or other FDA-regulated products. Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals's FEI number is 3005452106.
What types of violations has Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals received?
Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals has been cited for 13 different violation type(s). Common FDA violations include adulteration (unsafe or unsanitary products), misbranding (incorrect or misleading labels), and regulatory non-compliance.
Where does this information about Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals come from?
All FDA import refusal data for Canadian Phytopharmaceuticals is sourced from the official FDA Data Dashboard (datadashboard.fda.gov), a public government database maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Data sourced from the FDA Data Dashboard, a public database maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.